Search for: "Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Discussion and analysis of WTO Ministerial meeting progress on TRIPs issues: (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IP Updates), Italian broadcaster, Mediaset sues Google for hosting video… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
And Judge Don Willett receives coverage from Abby Zeugner for The News & Observer and Adia Robinson for ABC News; Edith Roberts has this blog’s profile. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 3:25 am
A1336 McEneny (MS) -- Enacts provisions relating to the reporting of child abuse No Same as Last Act: 06/11/07 REFERRED TO RULESA7087 Thiele -- Designates the court officer of the village of Westhampton Beach to be peace officers Same as Uni. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
One of the ways we feed this blog is doing what comes naturally to us lawyers - reading recent cases - and hoping that something inspires us. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:06 am
In the U.S., a deal like this can close unless a federal district court orders a preliminary injunction, meaning the regulator has to go to court and ask for it, but a court decides. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am
In this opinion, the federal district court judge who has the case is ruling on the defendants’ motion, under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss all of Lazette’s causes of action. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 13-10400, is the high-profile one, asking whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) gives a district court the discretion to extend the time for service of process absent a showing of good cause. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm
Background Regarding Judicial Notice and Incorporation By Reference Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, courts may not consider material from outside the pleadings when assessing the sufficiency of a complaint in a motion to dismiss. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
I welcome guest posts from responsible commentators on topics relevant to this blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 12:30 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
Offer of judgment under Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: effect on awardRule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a party to an action to make an offer of judgment to the other side. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 8:24 am
It was also cited in the United Nations Human Rights Special Procedures' "Global Study on the Impact of Counter-terrorism on Civil Society and Civil Space" and other reports. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 7:01 am
Supreme Court in EEOC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Boyar & Miller, P.C., No. 06-1936, 2007 U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent… [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 2:01 pm
Under the Federal Rules for Civil Procedure (FRCP), which took effect December 1, 2006, businesses need to have policies in place on how they will produce electronic documents they hold in the event of a federal court lawsuit. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
(Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents Mr. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
There is a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for non-compliance. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Patel.] [read post]