Search for: "Consumer Law Associates, LLC" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In 2009, the county sheriff’s association approached the Association about hosting a three day rodeo as a fundraiser. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 1:00 am by Taras Rudnitsky
  The defendants were John Williams from Norcross, Georgia; his 2 affected companies were Williams, Scott & Associates, LLC and WSA, LLC. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:09 pm
The feds also found no evidence that they knew that, for four years, their eggs were deliberately mislabeled in order to fool both regulators and consumers. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Scoville leads a team of over a half dozen professionals charged with advertising substantiation, trademarks and brand protection, and other intellectual property issues at RE/MAX, LLC, which franchises real estate brokerage operations with over 90,000 sales associates, in over 6,000 franchised offices, in over 95 countries.Rebecca L. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:56 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Selling Source, LLC Franchisor Isn’t Liable Under the TCPA for Franchisees’ Text Message Campaign – Thomas v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:38 am by Doug Cornelius
Valente is barred from association with any FINRA member. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:52 am by Bill Marler
June, 2007: United Food Group, LLC, recalled approximately 5.7 million pounds of fresh and frozen ground beef products. [read post]
25 May 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/7e8CRTEkIT -> Identity not disclosed for privacy reasons DIGITAL MUSIC NEWS LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:57 am by Bill Marler
Currently, no other common grocery stores or restaurants are associated with illnesses. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:56 am
Best Chairs contends that Defendant's use of the BESTCHAIR and BEST CHAIR marks: has a substantial likelihood of causing confusion and mistake by consumers as to the source of Defendant's products; has a substantial likelihood of causing confusion and mistake by consumers as to the affiliation, connection, or association of Defendant with Best Chairs; and in addition to creating a likelihood of confusion, has caused actual confusion in the marketplace. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:41 am by Reed Freeman
KEY POINTS The court’s decision shows that, when determining whether unique IDs associated with consumers’ online video viewing history are PII regulated by the VPPA, context matters. [read post]