Search for: "Cook v. State"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 3,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2007, 5:14 am
We've also practiced in Cook County, and that venue can be tough on defendants too.But things have been looking up in Illinois lately, and the state's most recent pharmaceutical class action decision, Jensen v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 am
Mark Janus, et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:34 pm
Related blog posts: Cook County Jury Finds for Driver of Car in Motorcyclist’s Injury Case – Utterback v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:52 am
Cook, 334 F.3d at 124. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:15 pm
” Wendling v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 5:23 am
(And in some states, like California, they cannot do so without running afoul of state minimum wage laws.) [read post]
Customs and Border Protection Officer's Haboring Conviction Reversed While Bribery Conviction Upheld
9 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am
While a majority of judges have upheld its constitutionality, a Cook County circuit court judge held the statute was unconstitutional in Hyland, etc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
O’Donnell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:30 am
One of those two employees was unsure if the person underneath was a man or a woman, according to the court documents.The case used to illustrate the doctrine in my torts casebook was Yania v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:44 am
The Court's order states: The motion of petitioner to strike the brief of the Cook respondents is denied. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:42 pm
Cook, [83 O.St.3d. 404 (1998)], and Norwood v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am
In doing so, the Court stated that, `a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
Anders gave a legal history talk discussing the range of responses to Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:52 pm
I thought CL&P blog readers might find interesting the recent opinion in a North Carolina state court class action, Moody v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
” Cook v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:36 am
” The other stay issued by the Court is Daniel Wayne Cook v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the1st Circuit 2006) (quoting Cook v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm
Government Payment Service, Inc. v. [read post]