Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 48,938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 1:07 pm
In the case of Ransom v. [read post]
Blocking injunctions and their costs: some details of the forthcoming Supreme Court round of Cartier
24 Jan 2018, 4:37 am
Furthermore, that interpretation appears to be supported by the Court of Justice’s statement in L'Oréal v. eBay at [at 139] that such measures ‘must not be excessively costly’. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 12:21 pm
USA v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:25 am
In today’s case (Brooks v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 4:33 am
See Newburgh v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 11:29 am
Author Jonas Magnus Lystad Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikipedia Commons Jane LambertChancery Division (Iain Purvis KC) Unicorn Studio Inc v Veronese SpAS [2024] EWHC 1098 (Ch) (21 June 2024)This appeal highlights the importance of timely applications under CPR52.19 (4) in appeals to the Court from the Trade Marks Registry.A party who wishes to appeal against [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:57 am
In today’s case (Gehlen v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:34 am
2010AP2765 In re the marriage of: Schroeder v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 12:01 am
Torres v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:20 am
Brandeis University, et. al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Weslowski v Vanderhoef, 98 AD3d 1123, the Appellate Division opined that in the event an agency conditions disclosure of material sought pursuant to FOIL upon the prepayment of costs or refuses to disclose records except upon prepayment of costs, the agency has the burden of articulating a particularized and specific justification' for the imposition of those fees. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:28 pm
Recent Case: State of Missouri (FSD) v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
" Citing Matter of Weslowski v Vanderhoef, 98 AD3d 1123, the Appellate Division opined that in the event an agency conditions disclosure of material sought pursuant to FOIL upon the prepayment of costs or refuses to disclose records except upon prepayment of costs, the agency has the burden of articulating a particularized and specific justification' for the imposition of those fees. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:14 pm
See Li v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:18 am
Title VII attorneys’ fees as part of “costs. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:32 am
Regina (Buglife - The Invertebrate Conservation Trust) v Thurrock Thames Gateway Development Corporation Court of Appeal “Where a party with limited means applied for a protective costs order to bring a matter of public importance before the court, and that party was represented by means of a conditional fee agreement, the agreed success fee was relevant to the amount of the cap on the costs order and consequently was to be disclosed to the court. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:27 am
" Moore v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 10:46 am
Today the Texas Supreme Court decided Carl v. [read post]
