Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 4,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2020, 5:09 pm
Blumenthal v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 5:09 pm
Blumenthal v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
Houston Red C LLC, No. 18-0228 (Tex. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am
When the scope of the interstate commerce authority expanded during World War II, with the Supreme Court’s 1942 Wickard v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:28 am
C-170/13). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am
[C.] [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:53 am
Shapiro v Ettenson, 2019 NY Slip Op 33793(U) [Sup Ct NY County Dec. 23, 2019]. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court dismissed the Petitioner's CPLR Article 78 action seeking a review of a determination by the Commissioner of Education [Commissioner], alleging that that the penalties imposed by the Commissioner "were excessive and improper.The Commissioner had affirmed the decision of a hearing officer that Petitioner had operated an English as a second language school without, among other things, [a] being certified; [b] employing at least one private school agent, [c] paying… [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court dismissed the Petitioner's CPLR Article 78 action seeking a review of a determination by the Commissioner of Education [Commissioner], alleging that that the penalties imposed by the Commissioner "were excessive and improper.The Commissioner had affirmed the decision of a hearing officer that Petitioner had operated an English as a second language school without, among other things, [a] being certified; [b] employing at least one private school agent, [c] paying… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Azar, et al, No 18 –CV-0040 (D>D.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:28 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 12:55 pm
The case concerns an SPC based on a second medical use/formulation patent and stems from a referral to the CJEU made by the Paris Court of Appeal with decision of 9 October 2018 in Santen v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:56 pm
§ 314(d), the “determination . . . [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:14 am
Section 230(c)(1). [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:03 am
From Apodaca-Fisk v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:56 am
” This case would have better fitted into the Roommates.com standard when a defendant adds illegality to otherwise-legal third party content. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm
Who knew we’d see such drama in Canada?) [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:46 am
” Rule 41(f)(2)(C). [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am
The court of appeals' contrary reading--that Congress in 2017 amended § 5000A to change a legal choice between two options into an invalid mandate to perform only the first of those options--thus makes no sense and flies in the face of the Supreme Court's authoritative reading of § 5000A (a reading that was necessary to its ultimate judgment).Second, there’s no evidence in the legislative history—none at all—that any member of the 2017 Congress, let alone… [read post]
