Search for: "DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR ASSOCIATION"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
For the purpose of this section, a bona fide office may be located in this or any other state, territory of the United States, Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia (hereinafter "a United States jurisdiction"). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:18 am
In his "Dodd-Frank.com Blog," Steve Quinlivan notes that the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently dismissed the petition for review. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:45 am
Looking at the last page of the US News Rankings, there is a big difference between the University of South Dakota ($11,208 per year in state) and the University of the District of Columbia ($8,850 a year in state) versus Touro ($41,070 a year) or Thomas Jefferson ($38,700); this disparity means lending limits would not affect low-ranked schools equally, by any means. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:18 am
In Maryland and the District of Columbia, if you are contributorily negligent and your actions make you as little as 1% at fault for the accident (where the driver is 99% at fault due to speeding or by some other violation), you are forever barred from receiving any compensation for your injuries. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:04 am
Bar Pro Bono Program Associate Director Mark Herzog; Assistant U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:21 am
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ordered (PDF) a new trial this morning for Ronald Coles, a local man convicted of shooting a police officer in the leg during a 2007 confrontation. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
James G. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia and sentenced to more than 40 years in prison. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned his conviction, saying the sheer amount of information that had been collected violated the Fourth Amendment, which bars unreasonable searches. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:58 am
In one notable departure from the American Bar Association's model code, the new code includes a section spelling out “reasonable accommodations” judges in the District of Columbia Superior Court and Court of Appeals can offer to pro se litigants. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:32 pm
In great detail, it reinforces Rule 49, the rule providing that in order to practice law in Washington, D.C., you have to be an active member of the District bar association. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Maddox, 11-670, in which the District of Columbia’s response is due January 30; Byrne alleges a split with the D.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:26 am
Bar with an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm
Forthcoming decisions – lower courts Stein v Bank of America Corp, a class action lawsuit in the Columbia District Court, concerns the transfer of data which takes place when customers of the financial industry’s calls are put through to call centres outside the US (featured on The Data Privacy Monitor Blog). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am
California, 11-290) argued that the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:51 pm
We are also excited to welcome the involvement of the Women & the Law Program at Washington College of Law and the Women's Bar Association of the District of Columbia in this year's conference. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Second, it could seek preclearance from the Department of Justice concurrently with a declaratory judgment action in the District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 9:38 am
District Court for the District of Columbia charging him with making a false statement to a U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:56 am
The Justice Department claimed it uncovered a pattern or practice of discrimination involving victims in more than 180 geographic markets across 41 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:45 am
To qualify for admission to the Bar of the Supreme Court, an applicant must have been admitted to practice in the highest court of a State, Commonwealth, Territory or Possession, or the District of Columbia for numerous years immediately before the date of application; must not have been the subject of any adverse disciplinary action pronounced; and must appear to the Court to be of good moral and professional character. [read post]
