Search for: "DOE v. USA" Results 1221 - 1240 of 3,740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Collateral estoppel precludes a party from relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior action or proceeding and decided against that party or those in privity, whether or not the tribunals or causes of action are the same" (Reid v Reid, 198 AD3d 993, 994). [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Collateral estoppel precludes a party from relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior action or proceeding and decided against that party or those in privity, whether or not the tribunals or causes of action are the same" (Reid v Reid, 198 AD3d 993, 994). [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 5:47 am by Liskow & Lewis
 Because the Tenth Circuit had ruled to the contrary, see OXY USA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
The most recent case the Supreme Court has decided on the issue of the constitutionality of punitive damages is Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 9:18 pm by Patricia Salkin
Sanimax USA, LLC  v Village of Deforest Board of Zoning Appeals,  2017 WL 129928 (WI App. 1/12/2017)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Definitions, Uncategorized [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:30 pm
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256, 1268 n.12 (11th Cir. 2009), however, have uniformly concluded that federal jurisdiction under CAFA does not depend on class certification. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
As briefly reported in this previous post, the Fifth District Court of Appeal today reversed the grant of summary adjudication by the Fresno trial court in favor of the Episcopal Church (USA) and Bishop Jerry Lamb. [read post]