Search for: "DOES 2-25"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 16,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2015, 10:01 pm
If someone is storing food to survive some tumultuous event 25 years in the future, I say more power to them. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm
2. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:47 pm
It does. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 10:12 am
Id.at *2. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:01 pm
See in this respect T 774/05 [5].[1.4.4] The above being as it is, the Board does not see the need to provide for simultaneous interpretation from German to English for the accompanying person. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 1:07 pm
The examiners in the Klotzman case disagreed with that conclusion. 2013-06-25 PFD EOG Klotzman (2).pdf Although the Commissioners overruled the examiners, they did not provide any basis for their decision. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 6:20 am
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the Federal Register on January 25, 2013. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:07 am
Over 25 million people will sail on cruise ships this year. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
Under these circumstances, the 25 day "delay" by XYZ was reasonable and justified. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:01 pm
See in this respect T 774/05 [5].[1.4.4] The above being as it is, the Board does not see the need to provide for simultaneous interpretation from German to English for the accompanying person. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 11:10 am
(Art. 33(1))This sui generis right is vested in the authors of the computer program, their heirs, persons to whom the authors or their heirs transferred economic rights to the computer program, or the lawful users of the computer program (Art. 33(2)).The scope of this sui generis right includes the same economic rights that are granted to works (Art. 12), but does not include moral rights. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 3:04 pm
2. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
King, 126 F.3d 25, 27 (2d Cir. 1997); cf. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
UK divergence from the EPO on plausibility (Sandoz v BMS), Part 2: Interpretation of G 2/21Interpretation of G 2/21: Inventive step may be supported solely by post-published data (T 0116/18)G 2/21 does not permit armchair inventing (T 0258/21)Clarity on the interpretation of G2/21 from the referring Board (T 0116/18)Crystallising the interpretation of G 2/21 (T 1989/19)Plausibility in other technical fieldsA common misconception is that G… [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:01 am
Reg. 1.413-2 (only the IRS can do that). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:21 am
The approval of a clinical trial does therefore not, by way of a heuristic, imply an expected positive outcome of the treatment. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
Section 25(1) (h) allows an opponent to challenge the issuance of patent if the applicant -(1) failed to disclose to the Controller of Patents the information required under section 8, or(2) furnished the information which in any material was false to his knowledge. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 1:20 pm
BIDDULPH Sarah– Bureaucratic Inertia: What Does it Tell Us About Governance and Accountability? [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:39 am
If you are not registered, you need to get this done asap – check the ICO website here. 2. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
