Search for: "Doe v. Delaware" Results 1221 - 1240 of 3,878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2018, 6:05 am by John Jascob
Further, the court stated, precedent supports a controller’s right to preemptively protect a control interest (CBS Corporation v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:49 am by Joy Waltemath
Although the family urged that the court find a general duty of care for landowners to the public for off-premises injuries, the court held that creating such a duty would be contrary to state law, which does not use the foreseeability of an injury to determine duty (Quiroz v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:29 am by Steven Cohen
Kaye did not point to any articles, but the court noted that Delaware law does not require him to do so. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Factual BackgroundSix Delaware statutory trusts, identified as National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts 2003-1, 2004-1, 2004-2, 2005-1, 2005-2, and 2005-3 (the "Issuers" or the "Trusts"), were created between 2003 and 2005 to acquire pools of student loans, facilitate the issuance and sale of notes (the "Notes") backed by the private student loans (the "Loans") to investors (the "Noteholders"), and provide for the servicing of the Loans… [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” Count Vdoes not explicitly refer to any trade secrets in Count V” and “does not even specifically use the term trade secrets. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Both permissive and restrictive regimes exist across all three categories; the existence of some sort of property tax cap does not necessarily impose an effective restraint on property tax increases. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
KKR Financial Holdings LLC does not apply to controller transactions. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:41 am by Peter Mahler
” Justice Kornreich’s decision noted the absence of any supporting Delaware case authority cited in the defendants’ brief, and distinguished their reliance on the Delaware Chancery Court’s 2008 ruling in R&R Capital, LLC v Buck & Doe Run Valley Farms, LLC, about which I wrote here, in which the court enforced an LLC agreement’s provision explicitly waiving the right to seek judicial dissolution. [read post]