Search for: "Does 1-29" Results 1221 - 1240 of 12,900
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2014, 6:36 pm by Bill Marler
Illness onset dates range from Nov. 29, 2013 to Dec. 5, 2013. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 7:21 am by Bob Kraft
Department of Energy (DOE), as a rule of thumb, you can assume that every 5 mph you drive over 60 mph will cost you 7 percent more for gasoline. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
” [8.5] In order to assess what is the subject-matter claimed in claim 1 of the main request, the claim’s construction has first to be investigated. [8.5.1] In accordance with Article 7(1), second sentence, of the Revision Act of 29 November 2000 and the decision of the Administrative Council of 28 June 2001 (Special edition No. 1, OJ EPO 2007, 197), revised A 54(4) is applicable, since the mention of the grant of the patent in suit was published in… [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Memo. in Support of Motion to Unseal and Oppose Pseudonym­ity, ECF No. 27-1, at 8-9. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 3:00 pm by Steven G. Pearl
As public employees were exempt from all but two of the wage orders in effect in 1997, Wage Order No. 17 does not apply to CDCR employees. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
Id. at *28-29 (text added).Holdings[1: Irreparable Harm] [W]e reject Apple’s arguments and confirm that the district court was correct to require a showing of some causal nexus between Samsung’s infringing conduct and Apple’s alleged harm [because causal nexus is an necessary part of the irreparable harm inquiry that must be satisfied, irrespective of the type of product encompassed by the patent]. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:46 am
When does a lack of clarity "arise out of" an amendment? [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:00 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
There, the CJEU held that – while the mere provision of physical facilities does not as such amount to communication to the public in accordance with recital 27 – the installation of such facilities and the distribution of a signal by means of television sets by a hotel to customers staying in its rooms, whatever technique is used to transmit the signal, does constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive… [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 3:34 am
[possibly 'no', courtesy of para 41 in the Cassina decision: "the concept of distribution to the public, otherwise than through sale, of the original of a work or a copy thereof, for the purpose of Article 4(1) of Directive 2001/29, applies only where there is a transfer of the ownership of that object. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 8:25 am
On the contrary, the comparison must be made by examining each of the marks in question as a whole… The Court of Justice has made clear that the fact that an element is not negligible does not mean that it is dominant, just as the fact that an element is not dominant by no means implies that it is negligible’ (paragraph 29)  ‘Where a sign consists of both figurative and word elements, it does not automatically follow that it is the word element… [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm by David Kopel
Here is the discussion from the footnote on page 15 of the Solicitor General brief: * Amici Professors of Second Amendment Law accept (Br. 28-29) the validity of Section 922(g)(8)(C)(i) because it "requires a judicial finding of dangerousness" but reject Section 922(g)(8)(C)(ii) because it does not require a specific finding. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 8:53 am by Ivan Merrow
 How does legal education need to change in order to keep up? [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 2:10 am
How does that work? [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:37 am
 These are the 7 questions that in the AG’s opinion the Dutch Supreme Court should refer to the CJEU:1Does it constitute a “communication to the public” in the sense of Art 3(1) of Directive 2001/29, when a person -who is not the copyright holder- makes available a work -which was placed without the consent of the copyright holder by a third person an a website- on his own website through a hyperlink (in other words: in the case… [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
State 2017 Rank 2018 Rank 2019 Rank 2020 Rank Change from 2019 to 2020 Alabama 49 49 50 50 0 Alaska 5 5 5 5 0 Arizona 44 44 40 40 0 Arkansas 46 46 45 46 -1 California 41 40 46 45 1 Colorado 37 37 37 37 0 Connecticut 31 30 30 26 4 Delaware 1 1 2 2 0 Florida 29 31 22 23 -1 Georgia 34 29 29 29 0 Hawaii 26 26 33 30 3 Idaho 15 16 12 12 0 Illinois 27 27 35 33 2 Indiana 9 9 13 20 -7 Iowa 20 20 17 15 2 Kansas 28 28 27 38 -11… [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 6:20 am by Don Asher
For more, read: Illinois Workers Compensation System Overhaul Became Law on September 1, 2011: How Does It Impact Your Workers Compensation Claim? [read post]