Search for: "Edwards v. Means" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
This means that Delaware courts encourage directors to be business risk takers. [20] Second, since investors are by definition risk averse [21] it would not be necessary for directors, at least in theory, to avoid the use of derivatives for speculative purposes because (i) investors would diversify or modify their individual risk with less risky investment such as treasuries; or (ii) make their own hedges if they have not diversify or modify their risk. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Code ch. 36-9-23 does not authorize a municipality to collect a delinquent sewer bill by any other means. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACSblog, Brandon Garrett and Lee Kovarsky discuss Davila v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
This one is Chanel Inc. v Chanel’s Salon and Chanel Jones, 2:14-cv-00304, and sees fashion and cosmetics company Chanel as plaintiff. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:12 pm
Yet you don't hear any textualists calling for the overruling of Bolling v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:51 am by SHG
  The putative test, “clear and present danger,” arose from Schenk v. [read post]