Search for: "Fee v. Fee" Results 1221 - 1240 of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 8:14 pm by Thomas Kaufman
By Thomas Kaufman  (follow me on Twitter) On April 30, 2012, the California Supreme Court handed down Kirby v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
  Predictably enough, Justice Ginsburg asked him why the Patent Act provision on fees should be interpreted differently from the identically worded Lanham Act provision – referring to the Noxell Corp. v. [read post]
While New Jersey’s Open Public Records Act (OPRA), the statutory right of access, expressly mandates an award of counsel fees to a prevailing requestor, there has been some confusion among New Jersey courts, based upon the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in Mason v. [read post]
While New Jersey’s Open Public Records Act (OPRA), the statutory right of access, expressly mandates an award of counsel fees to a prevailing requestor, there has been some confusion among New Jersey courts, based upon the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in Mason v. [read post]
While New Jersey’s Open Public Records Act (OPRA), the statutory right of access, expressly mandates an award of counsel fees to a prevailing requestor, there has been some confusion among New Jersey courts, based upon the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in Mason v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:10 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The second standard, a more relaxed totality of the circumstances analysis under the Patent Act, was announced by the Supreme Court in Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 10:12 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Ultimately, the paper concludes that while TSX and TSX-V market data fees do not appear unreasonable, marketplaces with smaller market shares are charging fees that are high in relation to their share of trading activity. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:49 am
The Court has entered judgment against the RIAA for the $68,685.23 in attorneys fees it awarded to the prevailing defendant, in Capitol v. [read post]