Search for: "GORDON v GORDON" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2007, 1:21 am
Mar 01, 2007) (NO. 389)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York, and Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York (Meredith A. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 11:53 pm
City of New York Subscription Required RICHMOND COUNTYInsurance Law Triable Issue of Fact of Plaintiff's Serious Injury Raised Through Objective Medical Evidence Gordon v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:10 am
A lively discussion of the English approach to obviousness as applied in the Hospira v Genotech patent revocation application. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 10:58 am by Cyberleagle
Back in the courts, a recent decision of Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker in Elias v Wallace LLP [2022] EWHC 2574 (SCCO) continues down the road of upholding the validity of informal electronic signatures. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 am by CMS
Background 126 claimants brought a group litigation action against the defendant bank in respect of alleged sexual assaults committed by Dr Gordon Bates. [read post]
Red Bull GmbH v Big Horn UK Limited & Ors [2020] EWHC 124 (Ch) This case is an interesting commentary on the route that rights holders can pursue in order to challenge lookalike products. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:40 am
The second case concerned exactly that scenario: in Gordon v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
In July 2020, in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:19 am by gstasiewicz
According to the Arizona Daily Star, in response to a threat by Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon to challenge the new illegal immigration law, “Phoenix City Attorney Gary Verburg said only the City Council has the power to authorize lawsuits. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
To give rise to constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent, and exist for a sufficient length of time prior to the happening of an accident to permit the defendant to discover and remedy it (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836; see also Chianese v Meier, 98 NY2d 270, 278). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm by INFORRM
         MARIA JAYNE WYATT v GORDON A CARTWRIGHT  10/11/2010 8. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:14 am by emagraken
The defendants’ proposition that a low velocity accident cannot cause any significant injury to a plaintiff has not been accepted in a number of cases, including Gordon v. [read post]