Search for: "Gaines v. State"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 9,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2010, 9:02 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:36 pm
The third simply stated, ” Hey Trish, I notice your mailbox has been left unlocked for quite a while? [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 11:39 am
The insurer urged the court to follow Judge Posner’s 2001 opinion in the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Level 3 Communications v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:58 pm
” It might seem obvious that here in Oregon, in Washington or anywhere else in the country companies have an obligation to ensure that the products they sell are safe and function properly, but manufacturers of unsafe medical devices gained unprecedented liability protection via the Supreme Court’s 2008 Riegel v Medtronic case. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
In the landmark decision of Obergfell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 2:16 pm
Videoshare, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:33 am
Caglayan Orge Saylan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:43 pm
See Tull v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Perry & US v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 9:08 pm
At the government's request, the Sixth Circuit has published its previously unpublished decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:54 am
For example, the justices split quite vocally over this question in Ramos v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
[IPKat comment: 2 huge problems with this - (1) all these factors go towards showing that there's a link between the marks, but they don't really show that the link has 'rubbed off' on the later mark to give its owner an unfair advantage; (2) these are the factors that were used in relation to detriment to distinctive character, but the court has just said that these are two different types of harm; (3) the ECJ in Intel v CPM said such factors are insufficient for… [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 7:11 pm
In Fresenius Medical Care v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 8:53 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
A provision of state eminent domain law, N.J.S.A. 40A:12-4(a) gives towns authority to condemn and obtain ownership of property in other municipalities, and Cliffside Park is claiming that right in its complaint, Borough of Cliffside Park v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:47 am
In Wilgus v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:04 am
Here's a question for readers: How far do you get through the Tennessee Court of Appeals' opinion in State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:53 pm
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
