Search for: "German v. State"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 3,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2008, 3:14 pm
Bush v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:19 pm
Even when it is permitted (see this CAB entry discussing the Supreme Court’s Morrison v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:48 am
Supreme Court case of Meyer v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:19 am
The Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Bauman holds that personal jurisdiction existed over DaimlerChrysler Aktiengellschaft (DCAG), a German company, because DCAG maintained the right to control its wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, Mercedes-Benz USA LLC (MBUSA), such that DCAG could be haled into court in California due to MBUSA’s contacts with that state. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:37 am
Of the three key decisions that were scheduled for today, the least important one (a Nokia v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:02 am
Robart's legendary Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:00 am
The Right to be Forgotten The right to be forgotten (RTBF) came to prominence following the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling in Google Spain v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:41 am
Hot off the presses and straight from the source, I have an advanced copy of the International Court of Justice preliminary ruling concerning Italy’s counterclaims in the Jurisdiction Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am
This news follows a recent ruling in Latif v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Abel v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:41 pm
And should a German CTM court be obliged to restrain non-similar use in Germany because the mark are similar to a Spanish speaker? [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:35 am
Ortovox v Mammut The UPC also considered the role of protective letters in Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH v Mammut Sports Group AG, Mammut Sports Group GmbH (“Ortovox v Mammut”). [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
I plan to attend the appellate hearing, which I guess will take place in a couple of months.UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION OF THE KEY PASSAGES OF THE DECISION (with my explanations in [brackets]):In NetDoktor.de v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:17 pm
Before getting to the substance of this post, I want to join Vikram and V. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm
We attempted to file an amicus brief in Doe v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 12:51 am
As Matthew Levitt, a partner at Lovells has stated, the Commission will only be further encouraged to pursue zero-tolerance against governmental restrictions, and this will only serve to increase the potential for cross-border mergers.[26] ____________ Endnotes: [1] Case C-112/05, Comm'n v. [read post]
