Search for: "German v. United States"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,997
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2013, 9:34 pm
The anti-suit injunction and the summary judgment ruling focused on injunctive relief, but arguably it's also inconsistent with their spirit to press on with foreign litigation over monetary relief instead of having the dispute resolved in the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:29 am
As I explained then, Nokia holds a patent on the differentiating aspect of this microphone technology in the United States, but the related European patent application had not been granted, which is why the Dutch court did not order a recall. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am
On June 21, 2013, a jury returned a defense verdict in a rollover case tried in United States District Court, Aiken Division. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:52 am
In his Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
The New Jersey court unanimously stepped up to say what Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested in a lone concurrence in US v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 3:25 am
Based on the latest (2010) corruption ratings by Transparency International, my country, Germany, has better corruption control than 93% of all countries monitored, while the United States is ahead of "only" 86% of countries. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:41 pm
The brief argues that “The uncertain threat of litigation in United States courts, especially for conduct with no significant connection to the United States, could therefore discourage foreign commercial enterprises from establishing channels for their distribution of goods and services in the United States, or otherwise making investments in the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:28 am
But Bosch v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:47 am
Some clues as to the ITC's rationale were previously provided by the parties' submissions to the United States Trade Representative (USTR).Now it's time for the complete picture. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 12:08 pm
This is my second post today on Wednesday's filings in the Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:20 am
The study ends up in Section V with some concluding reflections, critical remarks adressed to the German authorities performance in the case under consideration and, more generally, in all cases arising out of human rights violations on the part of the German multinational corporations. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:20 am
At an HTC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:12 pm
Apple and Apple v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
The United States and Material-Support Bar for Refugees: A Tenuous Balance between National Security and Basic Human Rights, Drexel Law Review, vol. 5, no. 1 (Fall 2012) [full-text] "U.K. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:33 pm
Part V then considers the way Western secular states have facilitated this new role for religion in places like Afghanistan. [read post]
