Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 1221 - 1240 of 4,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2020, 3:31 am by Thalia Kruger
This was the question which the High Court of Justice (Family Division) had to answer in MM v NA: [2020] EWHC 93 (Fam). [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Congress declared the War of 1812.1 Congress declared the Mexican-American War in 1846.2 Congress declared the Spanish-American War in 1898.3 Congress declared World War I in 19174, and war against Japan, Germany and Italy in 1941.5 In recent years Congress had continued to exercise this responsibility, though in more amorphous terms: the 1964 “Gulf of Tonkin Resolution,”6 which was later invoked by the president as the legal justification for the entire Vietnam War, and the… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:08 am by Cory Doctorow
Equally importantly, a parody that's legal in, say, France, must also be legal in Germany and Greece and Spain. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:28 am by Florian Mueller
C-418/01) or, respectively, the Federal Court of Justice [of Germany] in Standard-Spundfass (case no. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, February 4, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.: Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution will convene a panel of policy experts to discuss President Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address to Congress and the nation. [read post]
Germany recently enacted a law that enables state health insurance schemes to reimburse costs related to the use of digital health applications (“health apps”), but the law requires the Federal Ministry of Health to first develop the reimbursement process for such apps. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
” At the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky writes that upcoming abortion case June Medical Services v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:34 am
Part III of the book concerns patent enforcement and has a special focus on US and Germany. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:31 am by Matthias Weller
The court’s answer to this question is in line with its decision in Wiemer & Trachte v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
  Moreover, it would be incompatible with the principle in Von Hannover v Germany that the fact of Royal status (or celebrity status) is not enough to justify privacy-invading expression. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am by Hannah Kris
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, Jan. 21, 10:00 a.m.: The Brookings Institution will hold a book event for “Unmaking the Presidency” by Lawfare’s Susan Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:01 am by Amy Howe
In Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| Sheeran v Chokri Part 2: Admission of similar fact evidence | New Year, Same Creative Authorship Requirement in US Copyright | Reader discount for IPKat book award titles! [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 5:26 am by INFORRM
   Please let us have any suggestions by email at inforrmeditorial@gmail.com Apart from the “Home Page” and the Tables of Cases, the top ten posts of all time were written by eleven different authors and were (in descending order) Top 10 Defamation Cases of 2017, a selection – Suneet Sharma Case Law: PJS v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal grants privacy injunction – Sara Mansoori and Aidan Wills How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Case… [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:06 am by Florian Mueller
And the language, "a hardship not justified by the exclusionary right," again places the emphasis on how important it is to let patent holders enforce their exclusionary rights, though the "patent holder's interests against the infringer" have already been stressed in the same sentence.It's obvious that the German statute falls far short of eBay v. [read post]