Search for: "Good v. State of California" Results 1221 - 1240 of 7,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2016, 6:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
§ 1915(a), require removal from a foster placement made under 1915(b), for the purpose of triggering the Adoptive placement preferences contained in 1915(a). (3) Whether the state courts erred in holding that “good cause” to depart from ICWA’s placement preferences must be proved by “clear and convincing evidence”–contrary to the text and structure of the statute and the decision of at least one other state court of last… [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm by Anthony Zaller
California law is clear that voluntary tips left for an employee for goods sold or services performed belong to the employee, not the employer. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:14 pm
  Can you tell not everyone thinks the statute is a good idea? [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:09 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
Comment: The parties did not do a very good job of drafting an agreement that actually accomplished their stated intent. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm by Patrick
 The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
Soon afterwards, the Getty Trust entered into negotiations to acquire the bronze, and finally purchased it in 1977.[9]Victorious Youth arrived in Malibu,California in 1978.[10] The restitution attempts by the Italian government The Italian authorities first tried to retrieve Victorious Youth when it reappeared on the market. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by admin
  In California’s case, the RDAs were nothing more than the locality’s tax-protected alter ego:   Which is good, which isn’t? [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:42 am by Lazar Radic
District Court for the Northern District of California in Epic Games v Apple, affirming in part and reversing in part the district court’s judgment. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
George King of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order in Pedroza v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 8:34 am by Eric Goldman
” There’s a good chance this opinion functionally overturns the e-ventures precedent because federal courts defer to the California Appeals Court to interpret California law. [read post]