Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
Will the public prefer its government to use its head or its heart? [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:37 pm
(On a vaguely related note, unrelated to this case, another Twitter defamation case is headed to an appeals court, also in California: “James Woods Gets Judge’s Nod to Pursue Man Who Tweeted He Was a “Cocaine Addict“.) [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
The Escobar Case As Modern Healthcare recently reported, the implied certification theory is heading to the Supreme Court via the case of Universal Health Services v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:02 am
First, the head diplomat suggested that rumored joint U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
The group stayed for around three hours before heading home. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:47 am
"Visger and his attorneys would argue that there's greater risk ending up in the workers' compensation system subject to medical decisions that take into consideration the payer's profit margins over the health and well being of the injured.It's a shame.We should not wonder why work comp has such a bad reputation.Visger's case was San Francisco 49ers v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/bGMN6YpnxR -> Google Can Derive Undisclosed Economic Benefits From CAPTCHAs–Rojas-Lozano v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:25 am
Although the diplomats found some common ground, they butted heads on both North Korea and the South China Sea. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:01 pm
YouTube can totally screw you and delete all your videos, in violation of its own Terms of Service, and there's nothing whatsoever you can do about it.So holds the California Court of Appeal.I'm not even sure I understand Justice Mihara's opinion on its own terms. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
California Teachers Association. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:19 am
Specifically, due to its failure to define the term “head mounted displays,” it was unclear whether the restriction applied to head mounted displays generally, or the particular prototype that Luckey developed for Total Recall. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 3:47 am
If oral argument in Friedrichs v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:30 pm
Comey v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 4:14 pm
” (Hughey v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:39 pm
The BAP Case: Free v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:51 am
Arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Last month, in Quesada v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
LEXIS 1965 (ED CA, Jan. 7, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge permitted a Rastafarian inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was not permitted to wear his religiously required head covering-- a crown-- into the health care facility visiting room.In Rezaq v. [read post]
