Search for: "Hoffman v. Hoffman"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2014, 6:34 am
Wolkoff v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:05 am
In Florida this is called the Undertakers Doctrine as laid out in the case of Wallace v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:30 pm
The first flash point between the UK and the newly empowered court is likely to be its failure to implement the 2005 decision in Hirst v The UK (No.2). [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 5:37 am
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
Rigoli v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:31 am
Spunar v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Apkan v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
There will always be a penumbral area where views may reasonably differ, said Lord Hoffman and Dame Arden.In his opinion in Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v William Grant & Sons Distillers Limited, Lord Hoffmann said that, although the requirement that the initial computation must give a true and fair view involves the application of a legal standard, the courts are guided as to its content by the expert opinions of accountants as to what the best current accounting… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Krumwiede, et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Smalls v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Ries v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:07 am
Thomas v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Buron v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 5:40 am
Rogers v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
Logan Bland v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:03 am
And again from Mike at C&F (who is just posting one great thing after another), the 8th Circuit decision in U.S. v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 8:00 am
Richey v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:04 am
Lord Hoffman (left, of Pinochet fame) reasoned that it was for Parliament to decide which international offenses should be made prosecutable in domestic courts and that the courts no longer possessed any residual power to create new offenses in the event of statutory gaps, no matter how pressing the public interest. [read post]
