Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 1221 - 1240 of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2008, 12:54 am
S-07-529, Mary Kay Davis (Appellant) v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 8:54 am
Lepis the provision that barred any reduction in alimony unless the ex-husband's gross annual income fell below $80,000 or the ex-wife's total annual income exceeded $30,000, (3) affirmed the order that enforced the New Jersey judgment of divorce by requiring the ex-husband pay 75 percent of the camp expenses for the children, and (4) affirmed the award of $2,300 in attorney's fees to the ex-wife. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 2:28 pm by Kyle T. Mordew
Our last case law discussion comes to us from the Ohio Supreme Court in Embassy Healthcare v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 6:20 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Jan. 6, 2023), plaintiff husband and wife filed a healthcare liability action based on alleged negligence related to the treatment of husbands broken hip. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 5:17 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The expert testified that she had included an offset to compensate for the fact that the wifes Social Security benefits were sheltered. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:24 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
A husband or wife may file a lawsuit against their spouse for the intentional infliction of emotional distress, as was done in the case of Clark v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 6:00 pm by Lorna Jaynes
More than one year later, a trial court granted Wifes motion for a domestic violence restraining order that barred Husband from going within 100 yards of Wife. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 6:00 pm by Lorna Jaynes
More than one year later, a trial court granted Wifes motion for a domestic violence restraining order that barred Husband from going within 100 yards of Wife. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:17 am by Diana L. Skaggs
  Wife was awarded one-half of 194/240 months of service credit as of November 2, 2007, the 20th anniversary of husbands participation in the plan. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 9:13 am
The wife's misrepresentation of paternity was held to be intrinsic fraud and therefore a husband must seek relief from a judgment within one year. [read post]