Search for: "In Interest of Doe" Results 1221 - 1240 of 138,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Steve Baird
The post What Does Snapchat Need to be Identified? [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 1:00 pm
Citrin, No. 06-1043 is a 1983 case which holds that when a license expires by its own terms, then its holder stops having a constitutionally-protected interest in it. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:09 am by Patrick Markey
In fact, 9 percent interest is charged on back child support payments. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 2:46 am
I am a proud member of a group of lawyers throughout the United States who represents individuals as opposed to corporate interests. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
” The decision does not mention Burford abstention or otherwise indicate if the defendants argued Burford abstention as an alternative basis for dismissal. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 1:33 pm
Example: A taxpayer receives a partnership interest that is subject to being forfeited if he does not work for the partnership for 5 years. [read post]
In March 2023, South Australia District Court Judge Liesl Kudelka held that Boyle was not immune from prosecution under the PID Act, finding that immunity under the PID Act does not extend to preparatory steps of making a public interest disclosure. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 12:04 am
Why, the reporter asked, does that matter? [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:08 am
Free speech does not protect employee making a racist statementPereira v Commissioner of Social Services (SJC-08218), the Supreme Judicial Court, Mass., 432 Mass. 251The First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech did not shield a twelve-year public employee from dismissal for telling a racist joke at a political gathering.Linda M. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am by Keith L. Miller
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) recently held that the simultaneous representation of business competitors by attorneys in different offices of the same law firm does not constitute a per se conflict of interest. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am by Keith L. Miller
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) recently held that the simultaneous representation of business competitors by attorneys in different offices of the same law firm does not constitute a per se conflict of interest. [read post]