Search for: "In Interest of IV"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 6,750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2006, 4:04 pm
Today's post involves an interesting article in the China Daily on how China's judges and prosecutors are studying law overseas and how that will impact China's own legal system. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:14 am
Another way in which Regulation A offerings differ from most other offerings is that Regulation A permits a company to gauge investor interest, or to ”test the waters”, by means of general solicitation or general advertising prior to the filing of an offering statement. [read post]
15 May 2022, 6:31 am
Coates, IV (discussed on the Forum here); The New Look of Deal Protection by Fernan Restrepo and Guhan Subramanian (discussed on the Forum here); and Deals in the Time of Pandemic, by Guhan Subramanian and Caley Petrucci (discussed on the Forum here). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:20 am
Parts III (The Regulatory Standards Regime) and IV (Collective Bargaining Regime) will be rolled out later. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
I recently came across two new class action filings against insurance companies that may be of interest to readers of my blog. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:02 am
 One working IV line will now suffice. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:47 pm
Yesterday Sam Antar printed a very interesting piece on his blog that sharply criticized the 2008 first quarter earnings release of Overstock.com (NASDAQ:OSTK). [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:15 am
Last Wednesday's Daily Journal includes an interesting summary disposition. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
She contracted a “staphylococcus auraus infection at the site of the IV tube in her arm. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:37 am
When the respondent captures revenue from advertising links to companies that compete with the complainant and lacks rights or legitimate interests in the domain name it presumptively registered the domain name to take advantage of the complainant’s trademark. [read post]
15 May 2022, 6:31 am
Coates, IV (discussed on the Forum here); The New Look of Deal Protection by Fernan Restrepo and Guhan Subramanian (discussed on the Forum here); and Deals in the Time of Pandemic, by Guhan Subramanian and Caley Petrucci (discussed on the Forum here). [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:13 am
Ever since I used a flat-fee real estate broker to sell my condominium in the spring of 2005, I have been interested in the plight of nontraditional (read: less than 6%) residential real estate brokers and non-broker innovators across the country. [read post]
30 May 2007, 2:53 am
The "Go West" policy in 2000 and improvements in China's western market conditions stimulated interest starting in 2001 and 2002. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
A recently completed study by Arlington's Retail Task Force outlined some interesting conclusions for ground floor retail, suggesting something contrary to the status quo of conventional urban planning thought . [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm
Plaintiff made an unsolicited proposal involving Star Wars marketing to Disney, but Disney responded that it was not interested in his proposal. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:43 am
Capizzi therefore sought a 33.33% interest in the Disputed Files. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:16 am
Some panelists have argued that the UDRP should be construed to eliminate the “and” where bad faith use is found under paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:20 pm
• Parties to the corporate restructuring transactions have the option to elect to adopt the special tax treatment on the relevant corporate restructuring transaction. (2) Conditions to be satisfied for special tax treatment under Notice 59 2.1 General requirements for special tax treatment (Article 5), including:- (i) Business purpose: the corporate restructuring should have the reasonable business purpose, and its principal purpose is not for the reduction of, exemption from, or delay in the… [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 6:10 pm
A synopsis of another ruling in this case involving different procedural and substantive issues in dispute is available here.Baron and Buchbinder moved to dismiss the two remaining counts in Natanzon's Claim: Intentional Interference with Economic Advantage ("Count I") and Unfair Competition ("Count IV. [read post]
