Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 5,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2013, 2:53 am
In re: M.P. [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 6:13 pm
(See In re Steele (2004) 32 Cal.4th 682, 688, (Steele).) [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:20 pm
Construction Injury Lawyers At Cutter Law, we’re proud to advocate for the hardworking people employed in the construction industry. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:04 pm
We're paying 'em as private attorneys general so we don't have to enforce the statute ourselves. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co. (1999) 20 Cal.4th 163, 180.) [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:14 am
But unless we're going to kill everyone who commits that offense -- and we don't -- I cannot figure out what distinguishes this case from the others. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
A relatively easy way to negate Article 15 of the California Constitution.You're welcome. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 8:53 am
'Cause I read the thing and know you're supposed to. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:17 pm
But, in truth, they're not. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:52 am
I know you’re gonna tell someone else. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 10:28 am
But he's actually not.How you can forget whether you're on probation or not is beyond me.Unless you're using way, way too much methamphetamine. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 1:58 pm
To me, it's a pretty hugely deal to formally accuse someone at trial of molesting you as a child, particularly when (if the defendant is to be believed) that the allegation is false.Especially when, as here, you're pretty sure you're going to be sentenced to death anyway, since the crime is so heinous -- and that, since it's California, the sentence probably won't be carried out in any event -- if I was a capital defendant, I could definitely see caring… [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 3:07 pm
So better ask.It's not that a jury has to find that if you don't ask, you're liable. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:35 pm
Not really a huge deterrent to participate in these scams if all you're getting -- if you're even caught -- is two days of probation.Though I'm sure he's a nice guy. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:43 pm
At some point, it seems to me that for probable cause purposes, we're likely to view weed the same way we view, say, opiods. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:42 pm
Especially when you're listening to this stuff exactly as it happened.On the intellectual front, however, I will say that the opinion is definitely interesting, and would the underlying dispute would also make for a decent law review article. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:28 pm
So the penalty -- the thing you have to consider when you're deciding whether to flee -- should be sufficiently large to deter the creation of that risk. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm
I know you're upset. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
(Wilson, supra, 28 Cal.4th at p. 817; accord, Sheldon Appel, at p. 885; In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, 650; see also Zamos, supra, 32 Cal.4th at p. 970.). [read post]
