Search for: "In re Interest of Steven S." Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2012, 11:27 pm by David Friedman
"(from John Brown's Body, Steven Vincent Benét's book length poem on the Civil War) [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
By Colbert's low standards, he was very deferential to retired Justice John Paul Stevens last week and to  Harvard's Larry Tribe earlier this week. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:07 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Pursue Probes “If there’s crime there, we’re going to find it and we’re going to pursue it,” Garcia said at an American Bar Association meeting in San Diego. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:31 pm by Mandelman
  You’re charging her 7.625 percent interest… what kind of unnecessary if not predatory garbage is that? [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
 While Steve has also posted some initial thoughts on the opinion here (and more is sure to come from others interested in this case), what follows is a claim-by-claim summary of the Fourth Circuit’s fairly lengthy panel opinion. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:41 am by Paul Horwitz
 Compare this to stories of hiring in the past, particularly at elite institutions (for examples, see Julius Getman's wonderful memoir, or Steven Breyer's recent GW piece discussing the genesis of one of his early articles, or the memoirish piece by Joe Vining in a recent symposium dedicated to him). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 pm by Alan Horowitz
  Justice Scalia then elaborated on his skepticism over the government’s attempts to prevail on the statute alone, stating that “we’re not writing on a blank slate here. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm by Steve Bainbridge
If a conflict of interest arises between the shareholders and Carlyle, the managing general partner can obtain approval from a conflicts committee that will be conclusive. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:38 am by Teri Rodriguez
You can also view Steven's TexasBar.com profile. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am by Adam Wahlberg
And that's in spades when you're talking about much smaller, local stations that simply can't afford to take the risk that there's going to be a sign that's going to be held up on a poster that has language that the FCC has strictly forbidden. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Alito, Jr., soon backed up by Justice Elena Kagan, wondered what would happen to government regulatory policy “when you get to only a handful of people getting their television via broadcasting.”  When Verrilli said “we are not there yet,” Kagan interjected: “We’re almost there.”  As the argument would later develop, Alito’s interest in that prospect seemed to reflect a belief that the Court should simply hold off… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The decision has lead to a number of Latin American countries removing membership of journalist colegios as a prerequisite to praticising journalism (and benefitting from associated privileges), including a decision of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court in June 2009 (Steven Strausser, ‘Defining a “Journalist” in Brazil’, J-Licence: Steven Strausser’s Blog on Licensing Journalists, June 7 2010 (if anyone has the official reference for… [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
Defense interests like rules because it gives them a bright line to knock destroy someone’s case with little effort. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:59 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Indeed, President Obama’s act of signing the FY 21012 act into law is particularly interesting in light of his criticisms of the Supreme Court for the original Kennedy decision. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 10:36 am by Ruth Raisfeld
Talks Has the Respect of Many" NYT Labor Reporter Steven Greenhouse described George H. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
But the ABA quickly re-wrote the regulations to increase disclosure and close loopholes. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 1:59 am
""Today's action should not be interpreted as a sign that FDA no longer has safety concerns or that FDA will not consider re-proposing withdrawal proceedings in the future, if necessary," said the notice. [read post]