Search for: "Jack Goldsmith"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 3:50 pm
Indeed, Wittes does not even bother to defend the Yoo-like memo written by his co-blogger, Jack Goldsmith, that the Court of Appeals repudiated in its first decision and repudiates again in this one. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:15 pm
That’s a scary thought, considering the smearing former OLC head Jack Goldsmith gave to the once secret “Torture Memo” under the Bush Administration. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
– Law), 'Unwilling or Unable': Toward an Normative Framework for Extra-Territorial Self-DefenseMarch 23, 2012: Jack Goldsmith (Harvard Univ. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm
Lawfare’s Steve Vladeck explains and comments: Jack [Goldsmith] just flagged the Fourth Circuit’s unanimous 39-page opinion throwing out Lebron v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:11 pm
(Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, and I are members of the Hoover Task Force that commissioned the paper.) [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm
This position would be contrary to the traditional view, but it has gained at least some support since Professors Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith first articulated it in the late 1990s. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
Like Jack Goldsmith, whose new book on the accountable executive is forthcoming and who as OLC head during a key time in the Bush administration withdrew opinions by John Yoo that Goldsmith regarded as unsupportably aggressive, Trevor viewed these effects as salutary. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:19 am
”Klotz will be joined on the committee by Lord Peter Goldsmith, who served as the U.K. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:29 pm
” UPDATE: Jack Goldsmith cautions that we should not assume that OLC was not consulted, though he urges. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
That paper provoked a reply, Against Cyberanarchy, by Jack Goldsmith, and those two positions – “cyberspace is different”; “no, it isn’t” — have pretty much defined the landscape of cyberlaw ever since. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
I have come round to agree with something Jack Goldsmith said over at Lawfare a couple of months ago, that as far as international law goes, there is not that much more to be said that hasn’t already been said. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 7:41 pm
In March 2004, Jack Goldsmith, then head of Justice’s opinion-writing arm, the Office of Legal Counsel, was asked to give an opinion authorizing the removal from Iraq to Afghanistan of a prisoner who was to be rendered to American custody by British military authorities in the Iraqi south. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:38 am
(Lawfare, a project of the Brookings Institution and Harvard Law School, and founded by Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, and Jack Goldsmith, is the go-to online daily journal on national security law; careful, measured, never crazy, and scrupulous about separating objective description from prescriptive comment. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
No More Jack Frost Nipping at Their Digits If your favorite lawyer must always take that urgent call, even in arctic temperatures, consider presenting a pair of touch-screen gloves. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:18 am
More recently, Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner start their book on the limits of international law by saying that it is in fact law. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:41 pm
Jack Goldsmith, who ran the Office of Legal Counsel under President Bush in 2003 and 2004, wrote that the OLC memo must be released because "legal accountability for the practice of targeted killings depends on a thorough public legal explanation by the administration. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 5:20 am
But Ken Anderson has beaten me to it over at Opinio Juris: As Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes have argued at Lawfare, and I have argued here, although it is certainly helpful to have a summary in the press about the issues discussed in the secret memo and their resolution, the fact that it is merely leaked (quite apart from not making available the actual text) is a grave part of the problem here. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 7:00 pm
As Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes have argued at Lawfare, and I have argued here, although it is certainly helpful to have a summary in the press about the issues discussed in the secret memo and their resolution, the fact that it is merely leaked (quite apart from not making available the actual text) is a grave part of the problem here. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:48 pm
As Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes have argued at Lawfare, and I have argued here and at Opinio Juris, although it is certainly helpful to have a summary in the press about the issues discussed in the secret memo and their resolution, the fact that it is merely leaked, quite apart from not making available the actual text, is a grave part of the problem here. [read post]
