Search for: "Jess Bravin"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2013, 4:58 am
As Jess Bravin reports for The Wall Street Journal, don’t look for Justice Anthony Kennedy to be performing any weddings – for same- or opposite-sex couples – in the days ahead: Kennedy told an audience he doesn’t “do weddings” because of his “theory that federal judges can’t take authority from state laws. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:06 am
Lyle Denniston reports on the ruling for this blog; Jess Bravin has coverage for The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:21 am
Journal Supreme Court reporter Jess Bravin’s book, 'The Terror Courts: Rough Justice at Guantanamo Bay,' thoroughly chronicles how the use of military commissions came about for the first time since the Second World War, and pointedly demonstrates the abundance of problems they faced once established. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:43 am
” Jess Bravin has the story for The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
Briefly: Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal interviewed Justice Anthony Kennedy recently. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:35 am
Jess Bravin covered Kennedy’s remarks for The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:24 am
On that last point, a passage on page 365 of Jess Bravin’s Terror Courts (2013) piques interest. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:55 am
United States; Jess Bravin of the Journal was there, too. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 10:54 pm
” In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin previews this Term’s oral arguments in Sandifer v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm
The piece wasn’t mainly about military commissions, but the following passage from Jess Bravin’s book, The Terror Courts: Rough Justice at Guantanamo Bay, seems germane insofar as it shows that Lietzau has not just discovered on his way out office a certain suspicion of the architecture set up in 2001 and 2002. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:45 pm
Tom Goldstein, Adam Liptak, and Jess Bravin have been invited to explain to the Heritage Foundation what an awesome term it had. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Perry, comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal and Michael Kirkland of UPI. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:50 pm
The filing (via Jess Bravin) is available here. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
” More reporting comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, in an expanded version of a story that Dan included yesterday, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Bill Mears of CNN, Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, and Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
., in which the Court held that an Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship for would-be voters is preempted by federal law, comes from Nina Totenberg of National Public Radio (audio), Bill Mears of CNN, Jess Bravin and Tamara Audi of The Wall Street Journal, Jeremy Leaming of ACSblog, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Laura Klein Mullen at JURIST, and Aaron Kase at Lawyers.com. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
Early coverage comes from Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Pete Williams and Erin McClam of NBC News, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Josh Gerstein of Politico, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Jesse Holland of the Associated Press, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, and Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am
Additional coverage of this decision comes from the Wall Street Journal‘s Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:45 pm
” Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes and Brady Dennis of The Washington Post, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, David G. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:45 am
” Coverage of the decision in King comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, and Aaron Kase at Lawyers.com, while at Angry Bear Beverly Mann responds to an op-ed in The New York Times by Akhil Amar and Neal Katyal, who argue that the Court’s decision was correct and that Justice Scalia’s dissent “did not get . . . history quite right. [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:23 am
Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports on the decision, as do David Savage of the Los Angeles Times and Daniel Fisher of Forbes, both of whom focus on the disparate views of two of the Court’s “leading conservatives”: Justice Scalia, who wrote for the majority, and the Chief Justice, the author of the dissent. [read post]
