Search for: "Johnson v. Long"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 8:39 am
[v] U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:03 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson announced the new system yesterday. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 7:00 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:26 pm
’” Id. at 9–10, citing Gilmer v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
This case presented a vagueness challenge to the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act sentencing guideline, when a similar provision in the act itself had been invalidated in Johnson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
It is neither too long nor too short, and neither excessively formal nor informal. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:37 pm
Just two days before Thanksgiving, in Babcock et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:34 am
Facts: This case (McBride v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:17 am
Stewart v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:14 pm
“In Jersey anything’s legal as long as you don’t get caught. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Racial justice and interracial marriage circa 1954-55 Question: Not long after Brown was decided, the Warren Court declined to review Jackson v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
(I need to preface this post with a caveat: It is very long because it addresses difficult issues involved in deciding when a Public Records Act applies to a state employee's use of his/her cell phone to conduct official business. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:17 am
The parties in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 10:08 am
Cirba et al., v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:52 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:07 pm
Per the (somewhat long-winded) terms of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
(When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
“Qualified immunity,” the per curiam opinion reads, “shields officials from civil liability so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. [read post]
