Search for: "Julie Hazard" Results 1221 - 1240 of 3,296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2017, 3:03 am by Edward Smith
The reason for the recall originates from a fire hazard risk due to an improperly manufactured fuel supply pipe which may disconnect and even cause a leak while driving. [read post]
– Recent Insurer Efforts to Void Coverage Based on New York Rescission Law, FC&S Legal, July 18, 2017 Fear of the Unknown Cause of Contamination, Food Safety Magazine, July 6, 2017 Total Recalls: 16 Hazards: Fire/Burn/Shock (5); Fall (2); Crash (2); Laceration (2); Violation of Flammability Standards (2); Choke (1); Impact (1); Injury (1) Click on the below chart for additional information. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 2:34 pm by Kelly Faglioni
– Recent Insurer Efforts to Void Coverage Based on New York Rescission Law, FC&S Legal, July 18, 2017 Fear of the Unknown Cause of Contamination, Food Safety Magazine, July 6, 2017 Total Recalls: 16 Hazards: Fire/Burn/Shock (5); Fall (2); Crash (2); Laceration (2); Violation of Flammability Standards (2); Choke (1); Impact (1); Injury (1) Click on the below chart for additional information. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 8:13 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
More Blog Posts: Slowed Highway Traffic Creates Major Hazard for Sleepy or Distracted Bus Drivers, Maryland Trucking Accident Lawyer Blog, published July 12, 2017. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
On July 19, 2017, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the United States, as the title owner of a former mine, was a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), despite the fact that it did not have a possessory interest in the property at the time of the disposal of hazardous substances. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:00 am by Claudia V. Colón García-Moliner
On July 19, 2017, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the United States, as the title owner of a former mine, was a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), despite the fact that it did not have a possessory interest in the property at the time of the disposal of hazardous substances. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 9:25 am by Edward Smith
A Santa Barbara County collision between a train and SUV on July 24 caused the death of the car’s elderly driver in Guadalupe. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 10:01 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
Department of Housing and Urban Development grants that were provided to evaluate and reduce lead-based paint hazards in housing. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 8:08 am by Jared Staver
The annual Tour de Fat is coming back to Chicago on July 29. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:45 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Product liability lawsuits against manufacturers who commonly used asbestos in their products often assert the dangers were concealed, and defendants failed to warn of hazards that were not know to the public. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:45 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
More Blog Posts: Slowed Highway Traffic Creates Major Hazard for Sleepy or Distracted Bus Drivers, Maryland Trucking Accident Lawyer Blog, published July 12, 2017. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Matt Hardin Law, PLLC
On July 1, 2017, it was changed again to include any vehicles with active hazard lights, including civilian passenger vehicles. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 7:30 am by J. Dana Stuster
What made the July 14 attack different, though, was the assailants’ flight to the al-Aqsa mosque and Israel’s response. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:19 am by Jon Hyman
#SharkWeek pic.twitter.com/hgOF0905aq — Shark Week (@SharkWeek) July 24, 2017 Yes, that is a man, paddling a pontoon bicycle, a few feet in front of a pursuing great white shark, wearing absolutely zero protection. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:00 pm by News Desk
Experts on an EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards investigated the trend of human listeriosis in different age and gender groups between 2008 and 2015. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:34 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The exception is called the “necessity rule” and allows for a plaintiff who is injured by a known hazard to seek compensation from the landowner if the hazard must be encountered by virtue of living in the property. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:25 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
In response, the plaintiff cited the “necessity rule,” which allows for recovery even when an accident is caused by a known hazard if the tenant must cross the hazard by necessity. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 11:18 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
Demella, July 19, 2017, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal More Blog Entries: Dangerous Property in Florida Garners Lawmaker Attention, July 17, 2017, Wrongful Death Lawyer Blog [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by Edward Smith
On Tuesday, July 11, a man from Sacramento lost his life after being struck by a passing Amtrak train in Vacaville. [read post]