Search for: "Justice Party (The)"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 60,433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 7:57 am
On June 17, 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a $11.3 million False Claims Act (FCA) settlement that touches on two key enforcement priorities: the DOJ’s Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative and pandemic-related fraud. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
The parties disputed whether Longoni used only Rast’s notes, her report, or a mixture of the two. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
” Yet prior to the 1960s, as Jamal Greene has shown, Dred Scott did not begin to occupy a position in a constitutional law anti-canon.[5] The publication in 1978 of Don Fehrenbacher’s highly influential book, The Dred Scott Case, cemented a new conventional wisdom that Chief Justice Roger Taney’s opinion was an “extraordinary cumulation of error, inconsistency, and misrepresentation” and “a gross perversion of the facts. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 5:51 am
Justice Minister Arif Virani and the federal government spent years crafting Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 5:46 am
This obligation to provide details about on-air fundraising efforts for parties other than the station applies only to programming that interrupted a station’s normal programming, e.g., a charity radiothon. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:16 pm
During oral arguments, several Justices asked the parties what would happen if they found that the plaintiffs in this case lacked Article III standing. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:57 pm
And if the parties do not meet some Barrett-specific burden of proof–cert-worthiness or enough irreparable harm–relief will be denied. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
” And since the platforms are not parties to the suit, they would not be bound by any outcome here. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
This reminder was probably especially relevant to this case, because at argument it seemed that many Justices have a somewhat nuanced, fact-specific view of when the First Amendment is violated by the communications and threats of government officials to third-parties. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
Sensitive personal data that a party markets as linked or linkable to current or recent former employees or contractors, or former senior officials, of the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:50 pm
Additionally, for a short time in 2021, Guidehouse admitted it used a third-party data cloud software program to store PII, without first obtaining permission from OTDA, in violation of its contract. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
The Justice Department announced today that it has reached an agreement with Low Taek Jho, also known as Jho Low, members of his family, and trust entities Low established (collectively, the “Low Parties”) that resolves two civil forfeiture cases. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:45 pm
In 1995, the Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), issued a memorandum specifically noting that the activities necessary for disbursing Social Security benefits that “operate under indefinite appropriations” are examples of activities permitted by necessary implication. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
Justice Department’s (DOJ) Antitrust Division (DOJ) in response to your Request for Information on Corporate Consolidation Through Serial Acquisitions and Roll-Up Strategies (RFI). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, said the government’s conduct was blatantly unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:24 am
The lineup: a majority opinion by Justice Barrett joined by the other two relatively centrist Republican appointees (CJ Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh) as well as the Court's three Democratic appointees, versus a dissent by Justice Alito and the other two most conservative Justices (Thomas and Gorsuch).Yet the long-term stakes of the case do not have a clear ideological valence. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:03 am
Trump’s Justice Department invoked state secrets to cover up Bush-era torture atrocities and to shroud CIA bankrolling of murderous Syrian terrorist groups (those mischievous “moderate” rebels). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:55 am
Because “the parties’ positions are still evolving,” and Idaho has also raised other constitutional questions that the lower courts did not address, Barrett concludes, the best course of action is to dismiss the case. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:11 am
Yet as Justice Barrett notes, it is not for judges to draw causal connections or find a basis for standing the parties have not asserted. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:51 am
Department of Justice and the states of Kansas, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, and South Dakota brought a civil antitrust suit opposing the merger of T-Mobile and Sprint. [read post]
