Search for: "Laing v. United States" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2018, 9:35 am by Katitza Rodriguez
While concerns and actions in Europe and the United States often get the international headlines, local groups in Latin America are doing the vital groundwork of investigating transgressions, lobbying for change, and litigating for justice. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 9:35 am by Katitza Rodriguez
While concerns and actions in Europe and the United States often get the international headlines, local groups in Latin America are doing the vital groundwork of investigating transgressions, lobbying for change, and litigating for justice. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:41 pm by Barry Herman
Cir. 2009), vacating certain aspects of the decision by the United States District Court of Massachusetts in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
United States, in which Justice Brandeis concurred, that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market” and in 1974, Justice Powell wrote in Gertz v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
La.) discusses various matters that came out in various ways, but has this to say about perhaps the highest-profile question: On May 5, 2022, Plaintiffs {the State of Missouri, the State of Louisiana, Dr. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:07 am by Florian Mueller
On July 7, United States Patent & Trademark Office Director Kathi Vidal encouraged stakeholders to submit amicus briefs with a view to the Director review of the PTAB decisions in two cases involving challenges to patents asserted by VLSI Technology against Intel. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an infamously murky 2006 decision on Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:26 am by Aaron Bruhl
United States, 449 U.S. 405, 407 (1981) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting). [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
This judge began his analysis of the motion by noting that to “`“state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of State law. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
Megan La Belle previewed the case for this blog. [read post]