Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 13,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2010, 6:49 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:22 am
We're so far away right now that we can't even see the line, no less know what the line precludes. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
In cases such as South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Constitution permits the people of a state via direct democracy to wrest power away from the elected legislature—in that instance, the power to draw congressional district lines—and move it to an independent citizen commission—i.e., one that is not controllable by the elected state legislature. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:51 am
It's way the heck downtown, and it has oodles of gay people. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
This term he refused to join Justice Sotomayor's opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:30 am
Thirty years ago, in Marsh v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:06 pm
According to the Census Bureau, there are fewer than 100 people with the last name of Travolta in the entire United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:22 pm
Today's apparently Rich People's Lawsuit Day in the California Court of Appeal.Defendants and plaintiff are neighbors in a gated community in Bell Canyon. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:04 pm
Bradley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
When you arrive at customs in Ben Gurion Airport, people with passports from the United States and the Palestinian Authority wait on the same line. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:13 am
Under these circumstances, when the time period charged, namely seven months, approaches the nine-month period found to be per se unreasonable in People v Beauchamp (74 NY2d 639; see People v Sedlock, 8 NY3d at 538), the People are subjected to "proportionally heightened scrutiny" as to whether their inability to provide more precise times is justified (id at 539). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In a part of Bush v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:06 pm
They set out a bright line rule – that a link by itself should “never” be seen as publication of the material to which it refers – that seems too simplistic. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
”This conception of clemency is continuous with a line of cases going back to the first United States Supreme Court case on clemency in 1833.That case, United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
Take HHS v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
” In Davis v. [read post]
