Search for: "Little v. Williams" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,718
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Rounding out the week’s refuse are two petitions hailing from the Fifth Circuit, Williams v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:18 am by John Floyd
Second, it was a “not precedential” decision, meaning it had little, if any, precedential value. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
Experts differ on the size of the effect, but I think that William Spelman and Steven Levitt have it right in believing that greater incarceration can explain one-quarter or more of the crime decline. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” [This became painfully evident in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
The judicial disqualification case the Court will hear (Williams v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Stored Communications Act (SCA), which is part of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA),[9] has been interpreted by at least two U.S. courts to forbid production of stored data of certain types only where the data are stored in the United States.[10]  With respect to U.S. foreign intelligence surveillance, the rules are much more complex,[11] but unlike the Wiretap Act and the SCA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act[12] generally prohibits conduct only by persons acting under… [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
The courts The courts were far more remote in the 1970s, like the judges, and there was little specialisation. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
  To her, the Court’s 2012 decision in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am by Betty Lupinacci
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]