Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
Central to the case was whether the House of Lords decision in Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2003] UKHL 5 covered the issue and whether Runa Begum should be viewed differently in the light of Tsfayo. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
But a claimant in a defamation or malicious falsehood claim who obtained permission to serve out of the jurisdiction had to limit the claim to alleged publications within England and Wales – a principle re-stated by the House of Lords in Berezovsky v Forbes Inc (No.1) ([2000] 1 WLR 1004) Mr Huda’s only potentially viable cause of action was the publication of the report to the GOC -he had no real prospect of establishing publication to… [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
“The People v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:21 am
She said The digitisation of the processes will follow as soon as possible for the existing contracts, provided that the Lord Chancellor’s court assessment suggests that the system can cope. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
V. issue, pp. 68-82).Ralph R. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am
Supreme Court judgment In a judgment delivered by Lord Hughes, the Supreme Court unanimously refused Mr Nunn’s appeal. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:04 am
In the case of obviousness in view of the state of the art, a key question is generally “what problem was the patentee trying to solve? [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:01 am
Lord Sumption has stated "I think that [the guidance] should be re-examined by the Patents Court and the Court of Appeal", so how might this practice vary if Lord Sumption's comments are acted upon, and how might a different policy on stays affect litigation in practice? [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
And in the week when Lord Geidt resigned as Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
The Court of Appeal consisting of Lady Justice Arden, Lord Justice Lloyd Jones and Lord Justice Kitchin (who gave the leading judgment) handed down its decision on this point last Wednesday in Comic Enterprises v Twentieth Century Fox Film [2016] EWCA Civ 455 . [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 6:01 am
Judgment in Jude and others v HM Advocate The Court accepted the Lord Advocate’s position that the appeals on the issue as to waiver in regard to the police interviews of Jude and Hodgson should be dismissed. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 11:17 am
CRC Credit Fund Limited v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm
Lord Neuberger MR recently gave a speech to the RICS conference on dilapidations. [read post]
