Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 4,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
There was, inevitably, reliance on Lord Neuberger’s ‘warning in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7; [2009] 1 WLR 413, paras 46 & 50 that: “47. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am
“You are doing the Lord’s work,” ABA News quotes Kagan as saying. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
In the case of R (o.t.a P & others) v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am
Reed (1971), her majority opinion in the VMI gender discrimination case, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:29 am
In his judgement Lord Justice Davis stated that the offender's conduct was sustained and persistent, even after receiving cease and desist notices, for a lengthy period of time; Evans also used sophisticated equipment for the purpose [at 19]. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm
In the case of Alexis v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:56 am
In 2008, the House of Lords (as then called) of England and Wales, in the Conor Medsystems Inc v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Carmichael and Sefton BC (HB) [2017] UKUT 0174 (AAC) Oh my. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
In G v UK [2011] ECHR 1308, Strasbourg held that his complaint was inadmissible. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
In R v Asfaw [2008] UKHL 31, recalling the Refugee Convention’s broad humanitarian aims Lord Bingham explained that minority persons fleeing persecution “may have to resort to deceptions of various kinds (possession and use of false papers, forgery, misrepresentation, etc) in order to make good their escape. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 pm
Popplewell J, referring to Lord Keith’s dictum in Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 (the “Spycatcher” case), decided it was not necessary for the disclosure to cause detriment to BHAM. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
More significantly, member states would risk breaching of their obligations under the international instruments cited. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:21 am
A similar exchange occurred with Actavis’ counsel and Lord Neuberger and the analogy of a dinner invitation stating “Come at 8:00 on 23 June”. [read post]
