Search for: "Lowe v. United States"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 4,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:52 pm
If taxpayers owe, they can make a payment April 15 by authorizing anelectronic funds withdrawal (direct debit) from a checking or savingsaccount, paying by credit (Discover CardR, American ExpressR, MasterCardR orVISAR Card), or by check or money order (made out to the United StatesTreasury) using Form 1040-V, Payment Voucher. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:56 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services, August 8, 2017, Pillard, N.). [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Danail V. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
Part V concludes with many unanswered questions to this current and controversial decision. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
In Creely v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:21 pm
" See United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm
Or would they have insisted that they all be moved to the United States? [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
The United States and State of Wisconsin intervened and joined the case as parties. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
In McDonnell Douglas, the United States Supreme Court created a test for courts to use when analyzing discrimination claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:20 am
The congressional commission that investigated the 2008 financial crisis concluded that the United States’ consumer-protection system was “too fragmented to be effective. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
In Washington v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:59 am
Comparative legal theory has heretofore emphasized that the United States is more consumerist than it is producerist—privileging low consumer prices over producers’ welfare. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:38 am
Add to this the alleged potential for "abuse" of discretion by the PTO director by virtue of the Supreme Court decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 7:00 am
Following the United States Supreme Court’s seminal ruling in Brown v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:30 am
After the Supreme Court in INS v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:05 pm
United States concerns the application of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:39 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:28 pm
United States, for example, the court upheld conditional regulations that threatened to impose highly disruptive conditions on private industry in non-cooperating states — specifically those firms that produce low-level radioactive waste, including hospitals and medical research centers. [read post]
