Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 1221 - 1240 of 36,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
There are (a) subject matter limitations, (b) scope limitations, (c) miscellaneous exceptions, and (d) exceptions properly so-called. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:33 am by Timothy R. Hughes
  It may have mattered quite a bit that this ruling was issued in New Orleans as opposed to Virginia. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 3:00 am by Laurens Ankersmit
Blogpost 42/2023 In Case C‑873/19 Deutsche Umwelthilfe, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice interpreted Article 9 (3) of the Aarhus Convention so as to provide access to justice before national courts for environmental organizations challenging approval of cars fitted with defeat devices. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Having worked through section 704(b) special allocations, the class turns to section 704(c). [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:29 am
On March 22, 2016, the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation (“C&DI”) regarding the form of proxy requirements outlined in Rule 14a-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. [1] In particular, the C&DI relates to the requirement in Rule 14a-4(a)(3) that the form of proxy “identify clearly and impartially each separate matter… [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 10:27 am by admin
July 1, 2024 OVERVIEW OF BILL C-59 AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPETITION ACT On June 20, 2024, Bill C-59 was passed, which introduced the third of three recent significant rounds of amendments to Canada’s federal Competition Act (together with amendments that were passed in June 2022 and December 2023). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGIA TSAIRIS, deceased, ESX-CP-0070-2009 & ESX-C-245-08, Walter Koprowski, Jr., J.S.C., May 31, 2011: A testator can execute a subsequent Will which revokes a prior Will, either expressly or by inconsistency, N.J.S.A. 3B:3-13(a). [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:06 pm
Although the Washington Redskins logo is probably less offensive than the logo of the Cleveland Indians, the name "Redskins" is, if not inevitably derogatory, sufficiently so to render the trademark in that name invalid under a provision of the Lanham Act denying trademark protection to any mark that "[c]onsists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  My colleague and fellow columnist, Professor Michael C. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:30 am
State, an 11-page, 5-0 opinion, Justice Dickson writes:The defendant, Eligio C. [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:46 am by Legal Profession Prof
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals accepted a consent disposition and imposed a one-year suspension in a matter involved serious dishonesty This violation stems from [the attorney's] representation of an international client... [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 11:14 am by Matthias Weller
On 11 November 2020, the ECJ decided in the case of Ellmes Property Services, C-433/19, on Article 24(1) and Article 7(1)(a) of the Brussels I bis Regulation (for our post on AG Szpunar’s Opinion on the case see here). [read post]