Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 1221 - 1240 of 5,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2007, 6:18 am
Merpel says, hey, this is a good idea, but you'll need a more attractive name. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 2:38 am by Julius Stobbs
In addition, Mitsubishi’s ability to realise the economic value of the goods bearing its mark was affected. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 10:54 am
The other, a Finnish Supreme Court trade mark ruling concerning three dimensional marks and likelihood of confusion between goods. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 4:15 am
The Board concluded that Ahmad "did not have a good faith reasonable basis for believing that he was using the NATIONSTAR mark in commerce for all the services identified in the application. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:56 pm
The Court found that the sale and distribution of grey goods can be a criminal offence under the article 92 of the Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
This passage appears to be a non-explicit reference to CJEU case law (Football Dataco, C-604/10, at [39]). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  For a student research paper concluding that unregistrable ought to mean unprotectable, see James C. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Is market definition in fact ubiquitous in trademark law analysis because it is an inquiry implicitly undertaken whenever a mark owner defines the underlying goods or services with which the mark is used? [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 1:44 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
[Another case where “use as a mark” would also be useful to explain why this is ok.]http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:10 pm
An exclusion of marks that disparage groups while allowing marks that praise those groups strikes me as viewpoint discrimination. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:43 pm
That factor—factor VI—provides that it is indicative of “bad faith intent to profit” from the mark if the person offering to transfer the domain name to the owner of the mark has never actually used or intended to use the domain name for bona fide sales of goods. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 7:14 pm
In re Cappucino's Cafe, Ltd., Serial No. 76586779 (December 12, 2006) [not citable].The Board readily found the marks to be "highly similar" and the goods "closely related. [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:08 am by Jack Bogdanski
Were they thinking that (a) a Ted Talks crowd would be pleased to have part of the program sucked up by a politician, (b) a Portland Ted Talks crowd would be sympathetic to anyone running against the establishment Democrat, or (c) this would be a good weekend for NRA Betsy to show her face? [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:24 am by David Leffler
The case regards Hasbro, Inc’s EUTM registration of the word mark MONOPOLY for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 28 and 41. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 5:56 pm
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:59 am
The Advocate-General's Opinion has just issued in Case C-149/11 Leno Merken v Hagelkruis Beheer B.V., better known as the ONEL/OMEL case. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:34 am by Howard Knopf
And they should not be charged more in Canada for identical goods that sell for less in the United States. [read post]