Search for: "Matter of Election Reform Amendment"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 8:23 am
As you know better than most people, campaign finance reform (and the current mess) is a lot more complicated than that. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:46 pm
“You gotta give them hope, “ said an elected official across the bay once upon a time -- a city supervisor named Harvey Milk. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Federal Election Comm’n, 558 U. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:03 am
But cutting costs is only part of the story.Ideas matter too. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm
The States Parties to the present Covenant,Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Recognizing that these rights derive from the inherent dignity of the human person, Recognizing that, in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ideal of free human… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
However, there is more to this than just the matter of reprinting the Constitution. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 12:21 pm
On Rate Structures: The 1986 tax reform act is a frequent reference these days when people talk about amending the Code generally and specifically about amending the corporate tax provisions. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:46 am
There has been no recent polls to capture the opinions of the Jamaican electorate on this matter, but a 2009 attempt by St. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm
Beginning in 2010, the NYSE prohibited broker discretionary voting in the context of director elections, which was codified in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
As an initial matter, no one should assume that the 79 percent of Americans who favor a constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United are “anti-corporate,” whatever that means. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:10 am
If the First Closing does not occur by September 1, 2008, as such date may be extended by duly filed amendment to the Plan, Sponsor will amend the Plan to update the budget and to offer Purchasers the right to rescind their Agreements within fifteen (15) days after the presentation of the amendment disclosing the updated budget, and any Purchaser electing rescission will have their Deposits and any interest earned thereon returned. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
Yet after an embarrassing display before the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health in July, CMS elected to save face and allow the contract to simply end on its terms. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm
The bills as they exist take very small steps in what needs to be a much greater total reform of the MSP efforts of the Medicare program in general. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
” The Law Commission of course advises the Government about Law Reform, and as we all know is often ignored, particularly where family law is concerned. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:14 am
Joined by 44 Republican Senators, Senator Shelby sent a letter last year to the President urging amendments to the Dodd-Frank Act to change the Bureau’s governance, replacing the single Director with a Board to oversee the Bureau. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
The Inspector General issued a series of reports this fall that examined the way the Commission handled certain issues, finding certain errors and suggesting reforms. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:36 am
Earlier this month, the Board published its final election reform rules. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
A few weeks ago I wrote a piece in favor of judicial loan modifications… you know, bankruptcy reform… the “cram down,” if you must. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:13 pm
On Wednesday, the Chamber amended its complaint. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:54 am
Beyond that, Congress could vote dictatorial powers for the president, cancel elections, bar speech criticizing incumbents (or just one political party)—two-out-of-three, so Congress passing, and the president signing gives the Court nothing to say about the matter. [read post]
