Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 1221 - 1240 of 3,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2012, 2:03 pm by Frank Bowman
This is my first venture as a blogger, so I’m not quite sure I’ll strike the right note. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
NJ Management Gp.: used image of 9/11 fireman juxtaposed against Iwo Jima photo; Fox was trying to say that they didn’t need to license that b/c they were commemorating the event. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:54 am
Sections 221, 221-a, 221-b, 221-bb, 221-c, 221-d, 221-e, 2 221-f, 221-g, 221-h, 221-i and 223 of the judiciary law are REPEALED and 3 a new section 221 is added to read as follows: 4 § 221. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
  This is a long post, so I'm putting the rest of it after the jump. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
A katpat to the excellent and well-informed Alex von Mühlendahl for guiding the kittens to this Opinion. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
This year, I’m taking a look at the history of Super Bowl logos. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:32 pm by Russell Knight
“”Minor” means any person under 17 years of age” 720 ILCS 5/12C-60(d)(4) In Illinois, “Curfew hours” means:(A)Between 12:01 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. on Saturday;(B)Between 12:01 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. on Sunday; and(C)Between 11:00 p.m. on Sunday to Thursday, inclusive, and 6:00 a.m. on the following day. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:46 am by Tim Sitzmann
However, the difference between subsection (b) and (c) appears to be whether there is a confusion as to the goods (section b) or whether there is a confusion as to some type of endorsement or association that could be “detrimental to the distinctive character” of the prior mark. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:08 pm
(C) Hence, the Due Process Clause does not bar Shi's prosecution.But (C) does not follow from (A) and (B). [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
Subsection (c) Reply Brief The proposed changes are stylistic. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:08 am by Bettina Clefsen (b/cl IP)
The subject matter has been touched somehow in the field of copyright, where the CJEU dealt with the question whether the distribution of copies from abroad infringes the author’s right of distribution in the country of protection (Decision of the CJEU of 21 June 2012 in Case C-5/11 – Donner). [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Jeff Welty
” As always, I’m interested in readers’ thoughts about the case and its implications. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Jeff Welty
” As always, I’m interested in readers’ thoughts about the case and its implications. [read post]