Search for: "May v. State" Results 1221 - 1240 of 119,447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
Individuals may be disqualified for employment because of misrepresentations in employment applicationMartin v Marchiselli, 262 AD2d 171Section 50.4 of the Civil Service Law authorizes the state department of civil service or the responsible civil service commission to disqualify and terminate an applicant or an employee if he or she has materially misrepresented his or her qualifications on the application form. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 5:29 am
In two decisions from the Third Department last week, the Court held that only a judge may impose all parts of a sentence - Matter of Dreher v Goord, 2007 NY Slip Op 10430 and Matter of Quinones v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 2007 NY Slip Op 10435. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
"The Coque decision further evidences the erosion in New York of the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:55 pm by Administrator
  The case is now formally known as Kristin Perry, et al v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:34 am
A legal malpractice claim may arise out of the giving of faulty advice to a client (see Scheller v Martabano, 177 AD2d 690 [1991]). [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:04 pm
The trier of fact may draw inferences from the facts presented in the case but may not presume an element of the State's case.Held that the Court of Special Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's interpretation and application of the intent element for the crime of second-degree murder. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 24 May, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment in the case of R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:15 pm by appealattorneylaw
Florida’s criminal defense and criminal appeals attorneys who follow death penalty jurisprudence may be interested to know that the Eleventh Circuit has finally issued an opinion in Evans v. [read post]