Search for: "Miller, v. United States"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2006, 9:44 pm
KSR v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 4:33 am
United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976), and Moses H. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:00 am
” This brief article discusses the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida’s (Tampa Division) recent application of the futility doctrine in the context of a Miller Act claim in U.S. f/u/o Cemex v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 2:00 pm
This case (and its close cousin, United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:18 pm
The issue in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
It is estimated that 250,000 people die each year in the United States as a result of medical malpractice according to the U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm
In Von Saher v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm
In Von Saher v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm
In Von Saher v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
As noted by our friends at CAAFlog, we're currently seeing the Court grant quite a few Fosler trailer cases raising the issue below:WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
Bound by Ninth Circuit precedent, Miller v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:33 am
United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
United States holds that Miranda is a constitutional rule, not some sort of supervisory decision; and 42 U.S.C. 1983 provides that a person who "causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 10:04 am
" {Schad v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:20 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:48 am
Miller v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 5:52 pm
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
