Search for: "Paul Clement"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm
Naturally, I am pleased that the majority adopted the main arguments that Paul Clement and I laid out in our two amicus briefs, namely that the ATS should not be applied to conduct that occurs in the territory of other nations; that the presumption against extraterritorial application of U.S. statutes applies to the ATS; and that ATS litigation has caused the very diplomatic tensions it was intended by the drafters of the First… [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:40 pm
Elena Kagan – Associate White House Counsel to President Clinton, SCOTUS clerk (Marshall) Gregory Garre- 4 years as Assistant SG, 3 years as Principal Deputy SG, SCOTUS clerk (Rehnquist) Paul Clement – 3 years as Principle Deputy SG, SCOTUS clerk (Scalia) Theodore Olson – 12 arguments in SCOTUS, worked in OLC during Reagan admin. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 1:11 pm
She is followed by Paul Clement from Kirkland & Ellis, who is counsel of record on a mix of parties’ briefs in cases he argued (or will argue) and amicus briefs; Lawrence Joseph, who regularly files amicus briefs on behalf of various groups (for example); and the Cato Institute’s Ilya Shapiro — all counsel of record on a brief in nine cases. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 9:30 pm
Power suppliers’ counsel, Paul Clement, also argued that the order violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and was arbitrary and capricious in terms of procedure and substance. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
On the other side, Paul Clement files on behalf of ASARCO and provides a typically masterful job of marshaling the statutory language to justify a flat rule prohibiting fees for defense of a fee application. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 6:30 pm
Solicitor General Paul D. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:06 am
Indeed, to the contrary, they are more “proximately” caused: when an individual choose not to buy a domestic car, the “effect” on GM et al. is direct and immediate (and as Paul Clement argued, unemployed workers shift costs to the employed); whereas when an individual chooses not to buy insurance, the “effect” on health-insurers and healthcare-providers if that individual later incurs an unaffordable… [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:39 am
That will reunite former Solicitor General Paul Clement (Axon’s lawyer) with his former #2 Greg Garre (Cochran’s lawyer), who succeeded him in that post. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:37 am
Clement, then the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am
Arguing on behalf of one insurer, Moda Health Plan, former U.S. solicitor general Paul Clement (who in 2012 led the challenge in the Supreme Court to the constitutionality of the ACA) told the justices that the “net effect” of Congress’ actions was “a bait-and-switch of staggering dimensions in which the government has paid insurers $12 billion less than what was promised. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:55 pm
Indeed, Paul Clement, representing the North Carolina defendants in Rucho v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:11 am
During his 2013 confirmation process, he received vocal support from influential conservatives Ted Olson and Paul Clement. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:40 am
Clement, who will argue on behalf of the United States as an amicus. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
On the courthouse steps, other petitioners related dysfunctional behaviors by their spouses such as: insisting, for several months running, that they were “this close” to being invited by SCOTUSblog to offer guest commentary on the ACA; repeatedly manipulating dinnertime servings of mashed potatoes into busts of Paul Clement; passing off suppositions about Justice Kennedy’s likely vote on the ACA as “bedtime stories” to young offspring; and… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:26 pm
During the argument, Justice Antonin Scalia – long admired by conservatives as a champion of judicial restraint – was the most vocal of the Justices in supporting Paul Clement’s argument that the Court should strike down the entire Affordable Care Act, including hundreds of provisions that no one argues are beyond the constitutional power of Congress and bear no possible relation to the individual mandate. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:13 am
Solicitor General Paul D. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:11 pm
He recently chided Paul Clement during arguments in Seila Law v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
The case will have seasoned and respected advocates at the podium -- Solicitor General Paul Clement appearing first, representing Jay F. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:21 pm
Moderator: Linda Rosenstock, University of California, Los Angeles Routes of Exposure and At-Risk Populations - Paul J. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm
” As part of the same discussion, Paul Clement debates whether the Court’s decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
