Search for: "People v Denis" Results 1221 - 1240 of 15,951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:48 am
In 2008, Eugene, Andy Koppelman, and I appeared on a Federalist Society panel on “Freedom of Speech v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:05 am by Sansone / Lauber Trial Lawyers
    The post $ 103,000.00 – L.M.S. v Travelers Insurance appeared first on Sansone, Sumner & Lauber. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
People v Lane, 7 NY3d 888, 889 [2006]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266, 273 [2004]; People v Hines, 97 NY2d 56, 61-62 [2001]).People v Kolupa, __ NY3d __, 2009 NY Slip Op 06586 [September 22, 2009].Would you want to be the attorney calling Mr. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:41 am by Jon Sands
 He rejected the petitioner's argument that exhaustion was futile in light of People v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 11:51 am by National Indian Law Library
(exhaustion of tribal court remedies) and on 3/18/13 certiorari was denied in The New 49'ers v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 7:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Sweeney (Indian Child Welfare Act)  Petitions were denied in:Wilson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:39 am
 When you say something to two people, instead of one, that makes it more likely that it's true. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:27 am by Jeanne Huang
by Jie (Jeanne) Huang, Sydney Law School   On 19 May 2020, the Supreme Court of New South Wales rendered the judgment in Bao v Qu; Tian (No 2) and decided to enforce a monetary judgment issued by the Qingdao Intermediate People’s Court of Shanghai Province, China. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]