Search for: "People v. Davis"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,047
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
Last week in the Courts On 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) heard the important “serious harm” appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 7:45 am
Davis, Nos. 06-5073/5074, decided June 22, 2007, the Sixth Circuit affirmed a conviction on twelve (12) counts of aiding and abetting Medicare fraud. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
”); People v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am
The procedure in that case, Burnham v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:08 am
-Gary V. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:48 am
Davis is is extremely straightforward. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Rob Davies, a Guardian journalist was denied a press pass for a major gambling industry exhibition. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am
” Roberts v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy In Boumediene et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
“Hmm”, mused Merpel, “the lengths which some people will go to in order to secure the referee of their choice never ceases to amaze. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
As I note in that same column, corpus linguistics has also been used in other appellate opinions and was formally endorsed by the Michigan Supreme Court in the 2016 case People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
Rodriguez kicked butt on the rights issue, but the remedy didn’t go nearly as well, due to Davis v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 8:10 am
” People v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
The judge, applied the accepted “classic test” for frustration given by Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham [1956] AC 696, 729: “frustration occurs whenever the law recognises that without default of either party a contractual obligation has become incapable of being performed because the circumstances in which performance is called for would make a thing radically different from that which was undertaken by the contract”. [read post]
