Search for: "People v. House" Results 1221 - 1240 of 11,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2008, 8:06 am
In People v Jenkins (2008 NY Slip Op 07992 [10/23/08]) the Court of Appeals considered who has to prove what in order for a defendant to be entitled to specific compliance of a plea agreement. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm by Eric Goldman
In other words, people who try to cloak censorial regulations as pro-free speech are actually trampling on the Constitution. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
On 27 February 2023 judgment was handed down in the case of FGX v Gaunt [2023] EWHC 419 (KB). [read post]
11 May 2018, 10:26 am by Joel A. Webber
” … The Azko decision raises a big red flag for any business that might otherwise assume communications between its in-house lawyers and business people are protected. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:16 am by Buce
Abacus made it possible for more people to gamble on mortgages for no productive gain or loss. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
Last week, the House Judiciary Committee heard testimony on overcriminalization of regulatory crimes. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
  And that there are people (and people-populated institutions) who, for political and other reasons, deliberately want to make it harder. [read post]