Search for: "People v. House"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 12,995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
The political target of the Bill amendment, which the government says it will introduce in the House of Lords, is videos of migrants crossing the Channel in boats. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm
That section reads, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures and unreasonable invasions of privacy shall not be violated. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
We don't want delusional people defending themselves. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
The ICO concluded that there is always meaningful human involvement in the decision-making process but recommended that local authorities identify risks to people’s privacy, maintain transparency and ensure GDPR compliance. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 11:22 am
(c) people occupying insanitary or overcrowded housing or otherwise living in unsatisfactory housing conditions(d) people who need to move on medical or welfare grounds, including grounds relating to a disability, and(e) people who need to move to a particular locality in the district of the housing authority, where failure to meet that need would cause hardship (to themselves or others). [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Quick links Catherine Arnold, INFORRM’S Blog: Case Law, Strasbourg: Zemmour v France, Journalist’s conviction for inciting discrimination did not breach Article 10. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm
Carney (exploring the line between houses and cars) and California v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 7:55 am
The Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:24 am
Subsection (3) of that section requires housing schemes to be framed so as to secure that “reasonable preference” is given to certain categories of people including the homeless and “people who need to move on medical or welfare grounds (including any grounds relating to a disability)”, whether or not, presumably, that need itself technically amounts to ‘homelessness’ under s.175(3). [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:24 pm
Anchor Hanover Group v Cox (2023) UKUT 14 (LC) (Copy of judgment here. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:00 pm
” In Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
The parties debated them forcefully on the House and Senate floor, in state houses, and in campaigns up and down the ballot. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
Antitrust Matters provides engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 1:20 am
The case is Tenczar v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 12:52 pm
Each of the representative plaintiffs raised claims based on the tort of intrusion upon seclusion that was first recognized by the Court of Appeal in Jones v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm
However, what happens if the house burns down or gets flooded or a car gets stolen and scrapped? [read post]
