Search for: "People v. Lines" Results 1221 - 1240 of 12,237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
Generally though, this makes it very hard for people to tell consumers that their products are like trade marked products in some respect.]IPKat concluding commentIf Intel was the low point of Art.5(2) protection for trade mark owners then this has got to be the high point, particularly when taken in conjunction with the approach to comparative advertising. [read post]
4 May 2007, 8:16 am
This was the issue before the Third Department yesterday in People v Cabrera, 2007 NY Slip Op 03798. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:23 pm
  Or so many people believe. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
R(A) v Lambeth; R(Lindsay) v Lambeth [2002] EWCA Civ 1084 applied. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:32 pm
 The loss of that thing will potentially make people less happy. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 10:04 am by Jeff Gamso
  (Hell, this post is Part V in a series with that title.) [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Lyle Denniston
  If, as many signs indicated, the Court winds up splitting four to four in Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
The Court will explore in Bartlett v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 am by Bruce E. Boyden
A few weeks ago the 9th Circuit issued its decision in the long-awaited “Blurred Lines” case, Williams v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
What is more, the record shows that the Trustees hid or deleted negative comments from the Garniers that were not repetitive but did not similarly hide or delete positive comments from other people. [read post]