Search for: "People v. Lowe"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 4,810
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm
The legislators who supported the new statute identified those deserving of more lenient treatment as low-level, non-violent drug offenders, first-time offenders who were misguided in their youth and addicts driven to possession or selling drugs because of a drug habit as held in People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:03 pm
The outbreak had a relatively low impact on Connecticut, with only five reported cases. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 pm
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court began to address some of the unanswered questions in People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:38 am
The architecture is rich and varied, the people are warm and friendly. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 6:24 am
In fact, despite the new protections of Jones v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:31 am
La. 1986) (no privacy expectation for conversation "broadcast by radio in all directions to be overheard by countless people"); State v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 1:41 pm
Part V concludes. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
As a counterpoint to the above links, on his People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 7:43 am
” See, e.g., Schwab v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:43 pm
The bill seeks to incorporate into law the principles articulated by the California Supreme Court in Ingersoll v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:11 pm
As one of those fortunate people, I can tell you it was low-key but dramatic. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:46 am
In addition, people of low socioeconomic status, those who live in urban areas, and members of some minority populations are at increased risk for epilepsy. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
In December 2009, S was transferred to a low-secure mental health unit, under s38 of the Mental Health Act 1983. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 10:20 pm
(See Diaz v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 6:01 am
The court had to be alive to the possibility that some defendants were of low intelligent or were under the influence of alcohol or drugs and that they might not fully understand words of the caution, or the advice that they had the right to a private consultation with a solicitor before and during questioning. [47] Such vulnerable people might need to be given “more than standard formulae” if their right to a fair trial was not to be compromised. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:31 am
Similarly, the numbers of people arrested were absurdly low, as they were tossing people without reason, whether upon hunch, pretense or just to make the quotas (that weren’t officially called quotas such that the police could claim they didn’t have quotas even though everybody knew they did). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:48 am
A settlement has been reached in Stinson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
All of that may change, though, depending on the outcome of Connick v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 2:49 pm
Supreme Court decisions starting with Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
