Search for: "People v. Wear" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2021, 7:54 am by Steve Lubet
Johnson) or Shawn Eichman (the defendant in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:43 am by SHG
The second is that Judge Terry Doughty’s injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Supp. 2d 464 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (female Pentecostal employee who objected to having to wear pants); Kalsi v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Sometimes people trip when business fail to clean up broken or fallen items. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
Wearing religious symbols and the CJEU To the surprise of some (though not to us because we’d read the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Collins) on Tuesday, in OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22 the CJEU held that the ban on municipal employees wearing signs or dress indicating their religious or philosophical beliefs imposed by the Commune d’Ans, in Belgium, was not incompatible with their rights under the EU Charter: we noted… [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:24 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
He had dialysis three days a week and it was wearing on him. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 5:28 am by SHG
Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 29, 2016 Without needlessly delving into the obvious, Texas v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
  The Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”) states that some vaccinated people will still get sick because “no vaccines are 100% effective” and provides that it is “still learning how long COVID-19 vaccines protect people. [read post]